erythristic: (exhaustion.)
grell sutcliffe. ([personal profile] erythristic) wrote 2017-04-03 05:42 am (UTC)

[god, does she understand the frustration though. the most they can do right now is speculate, theorize, deal with the results. short of storming a building that might as well be haunted, what is there? waiting. waiting, patience wearing thin and constantly demanded. the most she can do is keep herself busy to offset it. sometimes that wrapped around to thinking.]

if you remember yourself being someone that you think you never could be, then what does that say? do you consider you there and you here two distinct entities? of course, that's an extreme scenario, but i'd rather start from the largest scale and work my way down. and if you've done something, does that make it real enough that you should consider that you've done it? that is, assuming that you consider then and now to be the same person.

questions i don't expect anyone to answer. merely consider.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting